Apr 24, 2019
Dr. Pennell talks with Dr. Ray Page about efforts to address the opioid crisis impact onthe care of patients, and what role oncologists can play on this issue.
Hello, and welcome to the ASCO Journal of Oncology Practice
podcast. This is Dr. Nate Pennell, medical oncologist at the
Cleveland Clinic and consultant editor for the JOP.
The opioid crisis continues to be a major public health issue, with
increasing attention at both the state and national level. Efforts
to address this issue are highly relevant to oncologists, because
we treat a unique population of cancer patients for which opioid
prescriptions are an established standard of care.
So how will these efforts to address the opioid crisis impact the
care of our patients? And what role can oncologists play on this
issue?
Today, we're going to be talking about this topic with Dr. Ray Page
medical oncologist and hematologist at the Center for Cancer and
Blood Disorders in Fort Worth, Texas, who currently serves as chair
of ASCO's Clinical Practice Committee, is on the ASCO Government
Relations Committee, and is the current ASCO delegate to the AMA
House of Delegates, about his new editorial titled, "Opioids and
Cancer Pain, Patients' Needs and Access Challenges," which will be
published in the April 2019 JOP.
Ray, thanks for joining me today.
Thank you.
So can you start out by giving our listeners a little background on
the magnitude of the opioid problem in the US.
Sure, Nate. Let me just first say, the opioid epidemic is real and
is startling. The CBC reported that in 2017 that over 72,000 in the
United States died from drug overdoses. And this included over
47,000 people who involved in drug overdoses of opioids.
And most of us have heard from the media that the biggest increase
in use is through that synthetic opioid fentanyl. And it's often
laced with heroin. And the recent volumes that have confiscated at
the US border are enough to kill ever single US citizen.
And the escalation of opioid abuse is really complex societal
issue. And it includes contribution from all of those social
determinants of health and mental illness. And when policymakers
sometimes they like to look at a one size fits all kind of
solution, which means they oftentimes want to largely focus on
physician prescribing habits and just regulating patient access to
opioids.
Is there evidence that this kind of solution of targeting opioid
prescriptions is impacting opioid prescribing in cancer
patients?
There is a negative impact there. But let me just say that cancer
pain is very real and it's very frightening. And we know that
cancer pain is historically undertreated. 8 out of 10 advanced
cancer patients experience moderate to severe pain. And about 55%
of cancer patients and 40% of cancer survivors experience chronic
cancer related pain. So upwards of 43% of cancer patients and 10%
of survivors use opioids to manage chronic cancer pain.
Because of the heightened media awareness about the opioid
epidemic, cancer patients are really experiences a lot of fear
firsthand. Many of my patients have expressed to me that they
actually have a fear of dying from taking opioids. And there's also
of addition. And then on the other hand, they also have a fear that
they may not even be able to get their hands on pain medicines at
all.
That actually is a really interesting topic that I hadn't thought
of because I have the same problem with my patients worrying about
taking opioids. You think that this being so much in the public eye
is really influencing cancer patients' ideas about whether they
should be taking opioids or not. They feel like they're at risk for
addiction and contributing to the problem.
Our cancer patients I think do have those real concerns and they
have fear over it. And we're actually seeing that about a 1/3 of
cancer patients and survivors are actually having difficulty to
getting access to their prescribed opioid medications. And that has
continued to increase markedly since just a few years ago in 2016.
And the vast US oncology practices are concerned that restrictions
on opioid prescribing is going to ultimately result in
undertreatment of cancer pain.
So it's these kind of dynamics what makes it difficult for
physicians to treat pain, particularly cancer and cancer survivors.
And while judicious prescribing is important, patients with cancer
and cancer related pain, they need to have consistent access to
pain control.
Well, I think we can all agree on that. Before we talk about how we
can protect cancer patients' access to these drugs, can you talk a
little bit about what is being done sort of at the state and
national level to address the opioid crisis and sort of how that's
impacting our cancer patients?
Yeah, absolutely. The opioid epidemic will continue to be a
bipartisan priority for both state and federal governments with
currently over 100 state bills that are out there that are
identified. In a lot of upcoming state legislative sessions, there
will be consideration of bills that are related to such things
prescription fill limits and prescription drug monitoring programs
and opioid prescribing guidelines.
And we're all expecting to see bills that are going to be related
to the identification of outlier prescribers and bills that are
promoting the utilization of opioid alternative therapies in the
cases of both acute and chronic pain.
Just on the federal level, you know in 2016, President Obama, he
signed the first major federal addiction law in 40 years. And that
was the Comprehensive Addiction Recovery Act. And that bipartisan
legislation authorized evidence-based prevention and treatment
programs and recovery programs and law enforcement initiatives to
help prevent overdose death and proper prescriptions.
And as you had asked, in 2017 when President Trump came into
office, he announced that his administration was declaring an
opioid crisis and made a national public health emergency under
federal law. And as a result, the White House office of the
national drug control policy directed numerous federal agencies to
address the opioid problem. But that was largely within their
current budgetary confinements. But I think actions by both
administrations had positive impacts on the opioid problem
primarily just by initiating activity in our government
agencies.
So when the various laws and policies are passed, do they have
built in protections for vulnerable populations that need access to
opioids, like cancer patients?
Yeah, that's one thing that we've pushed a lot for. And in general,
most of them do. And so President Trump signed a sweeping
legislation in 2018 that was touted as the single largest bill to
combat the drug crisis in our countries history. And there was a
lot of efforts to do things like expanding access to treatment for
substance abuse disorders and those kind of things.
But, for example, January 1st of this year, as part of that law, it
included new opioid prescribing policies that will impact Part D
beneficiaries and the prescribers. And this includes such things as
real-time safety alerts on pharmacy dispensing of opioids and drug
management and utilization tools and the improvement of
communications between the pharmacists and the physicians.
But as you asked, one important note about this legislation that
was passed is that residents of long-term care facilities and those
that are in hospice care and patients receiving palliative care or
end of life care, and patients being treated for active cancer
related pain, they are exempt from a lot of these
interventions.
Well, it's good that at least someone is considering our patients
in this. But I know that certainly-- I believe ASCO has quite a bit
of concern about maintaining access to patients. So what role is
ASCO playing in this issue?
You know, Nate, ASCO is very sensitive to the needs, to address the
opioid crisis and to support thoughtful and evidence-based
interventions aimed at decreasing substance misuse and abuse and
overdose death. However, ASCO really continues to advocate for
appropriate access to pain medications for cancer patients,
recognizing that that typical one size fits all solution risks
oftentimes marginalizing our cancer patients and their needs.
And so in 2016, ASCO released an ASCO policy statement on opioid
therapy which emphasizes the unique pain management needs of
patients with cancer and especially those with advanced disease.
And in this policy statement, ASCO points out a lot of core
principles to balance public health concerns and cancer patients'
needs.
Well, I really like the fact that ASCO is focusing not so much on
specific individual needs, but rather making sure everyone
recognizes that there is no one size fits all solution here and
also you know acknowledging that there is a real problem with
opioid misuse in the United States, but that our patients need to
be considered carefully in this.
One of the things I liked about your editorial was focusing on how
physicians might actually be able to learn about managing pain in
cancer patients and not necessarily just focusing on the use of
opioids. Can you talk a little bit about that?
Yes, sure. You know, just in general, as we all know, as
oncologists, we rely heavily on the use of opioids. But we should
never rely solely on the use of opioids. And we need to determine
if opioids are indeed the right drug for particular type of
cancer-related pain.
And so ASCO published recent clinical practice guidelines for
chronic pain management in cancer survivors that gives advice on
careful assessment of pain and its effects on function and of the
possible risk associated with an opioid. And so I generally
recommend that clinicians review some of these practice guidelines
because many of these recommendations can help reduce opioid
prescribing and actually consider other good, viable non-opioid
alternatives, such as using pain specialists and other
interventional procedures.
Yeah, I think everyone would benefit from being aware of the
problem and making sure that they are using opioids appropriately.
I guess I'm just a little concerned about how all this attention is
impacting our patients and their access to drugs. We did a JOP
podcast, oh, I think a year or so ago with Dr. Bruera, who is a
palliative care specialist at MD Anderson, who published a study
showing that palliative care physicians were actually prescribing
significantly less morphine equivalents for cancer patients. And
there was a lot of alternative treatments, such as tramadol, that
were being used. And we had a nice discussion about how perhaps
some of that was a good idea. But they're also putting sometimes
patients at risk of being under treated.
Yeah, that dynamic is very complex, because I think we all realize
that are certain types of pain that do get effectiveness with
opioids to get appropriate pain relief. But the palliative doctors
are usually very good and many oncologists also about entertaining
those alternatives. And so oftentimes there are many kinds of
cancer pain syndromes, both acute and chronic that can be managed
with non-opioid alternatives.
We as oncologists, we realize that this is a really vulnerable
patient population. And we'll continue to develop and utilize all
the latest advances in the comprehensive management of cancer in
accordance with published evidence-based physician developed
guidelines. However, we also want to design the statutory and
regulatory requirements do not unduly restrict access to opioids
and acknowledge the need to exempt cancer-related pain in our
opioid policies.
And I think that's absolutely critically important. And you know
this is exactly the kind of function that societies like ASCO and
the AMA really exist for, to protect our patients and the
physicians who are prescribing these necessary medications to our
patients.
Well, it's been my pleasure to share this publication with you. And
I hope it will be an important educational tool for the oncologists
to work on to deal the opioid access problem for our patients.
Thank you so much for joining me. I also want to thank all of our
listeners out there who joined us for this podcast. The full text
of the paper will be available online at ascopubs.org/Journal/JOP
in April 2019. This is Dr. Nate Pennell for the Journal of Oncology
Practice signing off.